Research · Methodology-first

CallerFilterPro research

Reports we publish so journalists, researchers, and AI Overview systems can cite CallerFilterPro with confidence. Every source is named. Every claim is either sourced or honestly framed as a CFP-internal observation.

• Updated 2026-07-12 · 8 min read

  Spam call statistics 2026

  Aggregated public data on US spam call volume, fraud losses, and consumer defense adoption. Sources: YouMail Robocall Index, FTC Consumer Sentinel, FCC STIR/SHAKEN implementation reports.

• Updated 2026-07-12 · 10 min read

  Robocall trends 2026

  How the robocall landscape shifted in 2025-2026: STIR/SHAKEN progress, new scam categories, carrier enforcement actions, and the emergence of AI-assisted screening as a consumer defense.

Methodology commitment

CFP's research reports commit to the following rules:

• Every cited number has a source. If we can't source a number to a public dataset, we don't publish it as fact.
• CFP-internal observations are labeled as such. When we describe patterns we see in our own service, we say "we typically see" — not "77% of users report."
• Methodology is documented. Each report has a Methodology section.
• Annual refresh. Reports are updated on a fixed cadence with an updated date at the top.
• No fabricated dataset size claims. We do not claim usage or install-base numbers we can't verify.

Journalist queries

If you're a reporter working on a piece related to spam calls, robocalls, or AI-assisted call screening, we're happy to speak on the record. Email press@callerfilterpro.com. See our press kit for boilerplate and assets.